Background and Purpose: Gingival depigmentation impacts patient self-confidence and quality of life. This study compares the Er,Cr:YSGG laser to the traditional scalpel technique for reducing gingival hyperpigmentation, assessing their effectiveness and other relevant factors. Patients and Methods: We conducted a double-blind, randomized trial with a split-mouth design. Forty participants were selected from the university's dental clinic and randomly assigned to receive either the Er,Cr:YSGG laser (2780 nm) or surgical scalpel. Pain intensity and smile satisfaction were assessed post-surgery, and treatment duration was evaluated. The Dummett Oral Pigmentation Index (DOPI) was used to determine the initial severity of pigmentation and to track both reduction and potential repigmentation over time. The Gingival Melanosis Record (GMR) was used to evaluate the presence and extent of pigmentation and to monitor recurrence after 1 and 12 months. Results: Both the Er,Cr:YSGG laser and surgical scalpel similarly reduced GMR and DOPI scores over time, without significant differences at 12 months (p > 0.05). A significant examiner variability was noted in GMR scoring (β = -1.2 for Examiner 2; p < 0.001). Power analysis indicated a higher confidence for detecting treatment effects in DOPI (75%) compared to GMR (55%). Patient satisfaction with smile significantly improved (p < 0.001). Treatment type did not influence postoperative pain levels. The Er,Cr:YSGG laser required longer surgery times (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Under the conditions of the present study, both Er,Cr:YSGG laser and surgical scalpel were equally effective in reducing gingival hyperpigmentation. Although lasers offer better bleeding control and require less anesthesia than the scalpel technique, clinicians should also consider surgery duration, cost, and expertise when selecting a treatment method. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes and economic evaluations, utilizing standardized clinical measures.