Various cookies are used on our website: We use technically necessary cookies for the purpose of enabling functions such as login or a shopping cart. We use optional cookies for marketing and optimization purposes, in particular to place relevant and interesting ads for you on Meta's platforms (Facebook, Instagram). You can refuse optional cookies. More information on data collection and processing can be found in our privacy policy.
David Nisand, DDS, Specialist in Periodontics He graduated in dentistry at the University of Paris 5, France. He was awarded a 3 years residency in the department of Periodontology and Implantology at the University of Paris 7 along with a 3 year post graduate program in Periodontology and oral Implantology at the University of Paris 7. He currently is lecturer for the Certificate in Periodontology at the University of Paris 7. From 2005 to 2007 he has been instructor at the Department of Periodontology, University of Paris 7, France. Currently President of the SFPIO (French Society of Periodontology and Oral Implantology) and member of the EAO communication committee. Member of the EAO Junior Committee from 2007 to 2011. He is co-editor of the European Academy for Osseointegration journal, Inspyred, and reviewer for the main scientific journals. Author of several international peer reviewed publications and book chapters and International speaker on bone regeneration, short implants, periodontal regeneration, osseointegration and implant protocols. Dr. David Nisand currently performs clinical work limited to periodontics and implant dentistry in Paris, France.
Speakers: Samir Abou-Ayash, Bilal Al-Nawas, Thomas Bernhart, Florian Beuer, Stefan Bienz, Elena Calciolari, Najla Chebib, Andreas Dengel, Vincent Donker, Joke Duyck, Roberto Farina, Gary Finelle, Alberto Fonzar, Tobias Fretwurst, Rudolf Fürhauser, Oscar Gonzalez-Martin, Stefano Gracis, Knut A. Grötz, Christian Hammächer, Lisa J. A. Heitz-Mayfield, Detlef Hildebrand, Norbert Jakse, Jim Janakievski, Tim Joda, Daniel Jönsson, Gregg Kinzer, Vincent G. Kokich, Michael Krimmel, Cecilia Larsson Wexell, Martin Lorenzoni, Georg Mailath-Pokorny, Julia Mailath-Pokorny, Frank Georg Mathers, Gerry McKenna, Henny Meijer, Alberto Monje, Torsten Mundt, Nadja Nänni, David Nisand, Robert Nölken, Nicole Passia, Michael Payer, Christof Pertl, Aušra Ramanauskaitė, Eik Schiegnitz, Martin Schimmel, Ulrike Schulze-Späte, Frank Schwarz, Falk Schwendicke, Robert Stigler, Michael Stimmelmayr, Anette Strunz, Christian Ulm, Stefan Vandeweghe, Kay Vietor, Arjan Vissink, Asaf Wilensky, Stefan Wolfart, Werner Zechner, Anja Zembic, Nicola Zitzmann
European Association for Osseintegration (EAO)
This author's journal articles
International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 4/2013
DOI: 10.11607/prd.1728, PubMed ID (PMID): 23820708Pages 483-489, Language: EnglishNevins, Myron / Heinemann, Friedhelm / Janke, Ulrich W. / Lombardi, Teresa / Nisand, David / Rocchietta, Isabella / Santoro, Giacomo / Schupbach, Peter / Kim, David M.
The objective of this proof-of-principle multicenter case series was to examine the bone regenerative potential of a newly introduced equine-derived bone mineral matrix (Equimatrix) to provide human sinus augmentation for the purpose of implant placement in the posterior maxilla. There were 10 patients requiring 12 maxillary sinus augmentations enrolled in this study. Histologic results at 6 months demonstrated abundant amounts of vital new bone in intimate contact with residual graft particles. Active bridging between residual graft particles with newly regenerated bone was routinely observed in intact core specimens. A mean value of 23.4% vital bone formation was observed at 6 months. This compared favorably with previous results using xenografts to produce bone in the maxillary sinus for the purpose of dental implant placement. Both the qualitative and quantitative results of this case series suggest comparable bone regenerative results at 6 months to bovine-derived xenografts.
The purpose of this clinical study was to compare the effectiveness of the supraperiosteal envelope technique as performed by three surgeons with different amounts of professional experience during a 6-month observation period. Sixtyeight gingival recessions in 35 healthy patients were selected and included in clinical recordings. They were statistically evaluated at baseline and 6 months later. First, clinical parameters (attachment level, pocket depth, recession height, recession width, and gingival keratinized tissue height) were calibrated between the three operators. Then, single or multiple gingival recessions were selected and surgical techniques were standardized by the surgeons (A, B, C). The root coverage percentages obtained by the three operators were 81% for operator A, 85% for operator B, and 89% for operator C, for an average of 85%; initial recession height values were 2.5 mm (A), 4.3 mm (B), and 4.4 mm (C). The preliminary results of this trial showed the capacity of this surgical technique to provide favorable clinical benefits irrespective of the initial dimensions of recession-type defects and irrespective of the learning curve and experience of operators.