International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, Pre-Print
DOI: 10.11607/prd.6879, PubMed ID (PMID): 3765597331. Aug 2023,Pages 1-27, Language: EnglishCouso-Queiruga, Emilio / Avila-Ortiz, Gustavo / Barboza, Eliane Porto / Chambrone, Leandro / Keceli, Huseyn Gencay / Yilmaz, Birtain Tolga / Rodrigues, Diogo Moreira
This study aimed at determining the correlation between gingival stippling (GS) and other phenotypical characteristics. Adult subjects in need of cone-beam computed tomography scans (CBCT) and comprehensive dental treatment in the maxillary anterior region were recruited. Facial gingival thickness [GT] and buccal bone thickness [BT] were assessed utilizing CBCT. Standardized intraoral photographs were obtained to determine keratinized tissue width (KTW), presence of GS in all facial and interproximal areas between the maxillary canines, and other variables of interest, such as gingival architecture (GA), tooth shape, and location. Statistical analyses to assess different correlations among recorded variables were conducted. A total of 100 participants and 600 maxillary anterior teeth constituted the study population and sample, respectively. Facial GS was observed in 56% of males and 44% of females, and it was more frequently associated with flat GA, triangular and square/tapered teeth, central incisors, and males. Greater mean values of GT, BT, and KTW were observed in facial areas that exhibited GS. Interdental GS was present in 73% of the sites and it was more frequently observed in males, the central incisor region, and when facial GS was present. Multilevel logistic regression revealed a statistically significant association between the presence of GS and KTW, BT measured at 3mm apical to the bone crest, and tooth type. This information can be used in the recognition of common periodontal phenotypical patterns associated with specific features of great clinical significance.
International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, Pre-Print
DOI: 10.11607/prd.6935, PubMed ID (PMID): 3781985011. Oct 2023,Language: EnglishGaraicoa-Pazmino, Carlos / Couso-Queiruga, Emilio / Monje, Alberto / Avila-Ortiz, Gustavo / Castilho, Rogerio M. / Amo, Fernando Suárez López del
The aim of this PRISMA-compliant systematic review was to analyze the evidence pertaining to disease resolution after treatment of peri-implant diseases (PROSPERO: CRD42022306999) with the following PICO question: what is the rate of disease resolution following non-surgical and surgical therapy for peri-implant diseases in adult human subjects? A literature search to identify studies that fulfilled a pre-established eligibility criteria was conducted. Data on primary therapeutic outcomes, including treatment success, rate of disease resolution and/or recurrence, as well as a variety of secondary outcomes was extracted and categorized. Fifty-five articles were included. Few studies investigated the efficacy of different non-surgical and surgical therapies to treat peri-implant diseases using a set of pre-defined criteria and with follow-up periods of at least one year. The definition of treatment success and outcomes of disease resolution differed considerably among the included studies. Treatment of peri-implant mucositis was most commonly reported to be successful in arresting disease progression for ≤60% of the cases, whereas most studies on peri-implantitis treatment reported disease resolution occurring in <50% of the fixtures. In conclusion, disease resolution is generally unpredictable and infrequently achieved after the treatment of peri-implant diseases. A great variety of definitions have been used to define treatment success. Notably, percentages of treatment success and disease resolution were generally underreported. The use of standardized parameters to evaluate disease resolution should be considered an integral component in future clinical studies.
Keywords: Peri-implantitis, dental implant, diagnosis, peri-implant endosseous healing, tooth loss, outcome assessment.
International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, Pre-Print
DOI: 10.11607/prd.6809, PubMed ID (PMID): 3747115920. Jul 2023,Pages 1-26, Language: EnglishCouso-Queiruga, Emilio / Garaicoa-Pazmino, Carlos / Fonseca, Manrique / Chappuis, Vivianne / Gonzalez-Martin, Oscar / Avila-Ortiz, Gustavo
The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) therapy compared with unassisted socket healing (USH) in attenuating interproximal soft tissue atrophy. Adult subjects that underwent maxillary single-tooth extraction with or without ARP therapy were included in this study. Surface scans and cone beam computed tomography were obtained to digitally assess interproximal soft tissue height changes and measure facial bone thickness (FBT), respectively. Logistic regression models were conducted to investigate the individual effect of demographic and clinical variables. Ninety-six subjects (USH=49; ARP=47) constituted the study population. Linear soft tissue assessments revealed a significant reduction of the interproximal soft tissue over time within and between groups (P<.0001). ARP therapy significantly attenuated interproximal soft tissue height reduction compared to USH (USH mesial: -2.0±0.9mm vs. ARP mesial: -1.0±0.5mm / USH distal -1.9±0.7mm vs. ARP distal: -1.1±0.5mm; P<.0001). Thin FBT (≤1mm) upon extraction was associated with greater interproximal soft tissue atrophy compared with thick FBT (>1mm), independently of the treatment received (P<.0001). Nevertheless, ARP therapy resulted in better preservation of interproximal soft tissue height especially in thin bone phenotype by a factor of 2 for the mesial site (+1.3mm) and a factor of 1.6 (+0.9mm) for the distal site. This study demonstrated that ARP therapy largely attenuates interproximal soft tissue dimensional reduction after maxillary single-tooth extraction compared with USH.
Keywords: tooth extraction, bone resorption, alveolar ridge preservation, digital image processing, dental implants
International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 3/2024
DOI: 10.11607/prd.2024.3.c, PubMed ID (PMID): 38787713Pages 252-255, Language: EnglishBrown, Evans / Stuhr, Sandra / Chambrone, Leandro / Childs, Christopher A. / Avila-Ortiz, Gustavo / Elangovan, Satheesh
CommentaryClinicians, researchers, and policymakers often rely on the available scientific evidence to make strategic decisions. Systematic reviews (SRs) occupy an influential position in the hierarchy of scientific evidence. The findings of wellconducted SRs may provide valuable information to answer specific research questions1,2 and identify existing gaps for future research.3 Therefore, it is of supreme importance that SRs are published promptly, reducing as much as possible the time elapsed between the last date of the search for primary studies and the actual publication date. A study published in 2014 assessed the publication delay of SRs in orthodontics, revealing that the median time interval from the last search to publication was more than 1 year (13.2 months).4 Delays in the publication of SRs or original research articles may depend on author-related factors (eg, timing of resubmission after receiving feedback from reviewers) or journal-related factors (eg, time taken to process a submission).5–7 Regardless of the reasons, clinical recommendations and translation of SR findings may be affected by publication delay. We assessed the extent of publication delay of systematic reviews in dentistry with the purpose of addressing its implications and presenting potential solutions.
International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 2/2024
DOI: 10.11607/prd.2024.2.e1, PubMed ID (PMID): 38507398Pages 139-141, Language: EnglishStevens, Clinton D. / Avila-Ortiz, Gustavo
EditorialInternational Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 1/2024
DOI: 10.11607/prd.2024.1.e, PubMed ID (PMID): 38265357Pages 7, Language: EnglishAvila-Ortiz, Gustavo / Gonzalez-Martin, Oscar
EditorialInternational Journal of Oral Implantology, 1/2024
PubMed ID (PMID): 38501401Pages 89-100, Language: EnglishTestori, Tiziano / Clauser, Tommaso / Rapani, Antonio / Artzi, Zvi / Avila-Ortiz, Gustavo / Barootchi, Shayan / Bressan, Eriberto / Chiapasco, Matteo / Cordaro, Luca / Decker, Ann / De Stavola, Luca / Di Stefano, Danilo Alessio / Felice, Pietro / Fontana, Filippo / Grusovin, Maria Gabriella / Jensen, Ole T / Le, Bach T / Lombardi, Teresa / Misch, Craig / Pikos, Michael / Pistilli, Roberto / Ronda, Marco / Saleh, Muhammad H / Schwartz-Arad, Devorah / Simion, Massimo / Taschieri, Silvio / Toffler, Michael / Tozum, Tolga F / Valentini, Pascal / Vinci, Raffaele / Wallace, Stephen S / Wang, Hom-Lay / Wen, Shih Cheng / Yin, Shi / Zucchelli, Giovanni / Zuffetti, Francesco / Stacchi, Claudio
Purpose: To establish consensus-driven guidelines that could support the clinical decision-making process for implant-supported rehabilitation of the posterior atrophic maxilla and ultimately improve long-term treatment outcomes and patient satisfaction.
Materials and methods: A total of 33 participants were enrolled (18 active members of the Italian Academy of Osseointegration and 15 international experts). Based on the available evidence, the development group discussed and proposed an initial list of 20 statements, which were later evalu-ated by all participants. After the forms were completed, the responses were sent for blinded ana-lysis. In most cases, when a consensus was not reached, the statements were rephrased and sent to the participants for another round of evaluation. Three rounds were planned.
Results: After the first round of voting, participants came close to reaching a consensus on six statements, but no consensus was achieved for the other fourteen. Following this, nineteen statements were rephrased and sent to participants again for the second round of voting, after which a consensus was reached for six statements and almost reached for three statements, but no consensus was achieved for the other ten. All 13 statements upon which no consensus was reached were rephrased and included in the third round. After this round, a consensus was achieved for an additional nine statements and almost achieved for three statements, but no consensus was reached for the remaining statement.
Conclusion: This Delphi consensus highlights the importance of accurate preoperative planning, taking into consideration the maxillomandibular relationship to meet the functional and aesthetic requirements of the final restoration. Emphasis is placed on the role played by the sinus bony walls and floor in providing essential elements for bone formation, and on evaluation of bucco-palatal sinus width for choosing between lateral and transcrestal sinus floor elevation. Tilted and trans-sinus implants are considered viable options, whereas caution is advised when placing pterygoid implants. Zygomatic implants are seen as a potential option in specific cases, such as for completely edentulous elderly or oncological patients, for whom conventional alternatives are unsuitable.
Keywords: diagnostic procedure, implant dentistry, lateral window technique, pterygoid implants, sinus floor elevation, transcrestal sinus floor elevation, zygomatic implants
The authors report no conflicts of interest relating to this study.
International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 1/2024
DOI: 10.11607/prd.6574, PubMed ID (PMID): 37819852Pages 59-69, Language: EnglishGonzalez-Martin, Oscar / Solar, Daniel del / Perez, Javier / Vargas, Marcos / Avila-Ortiz, Gustavo
Ultrathin ceramic veneers are a viable therapeutic option to manage esthetic challenges in the anterior zone. Proper conditioning of the intaglio surface of porcelain veneers is essential to achieve an adequate bonding. In clinical practice, this is typically done with chemical etching using an acid-containing agent, such as hydrofluoric acid. While it is well established that the etching effect is dependent on etching time and the acid concentration, little is known about the impact of etching time and the veneer fabrication method. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate, using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), the effect that different etching-time protocols have on the intaglio surface characteristics of ultrathin ceramic veneers fabricated with either the platinum foil technique or the refractory die technique. Several replicas of an ultrathin feldspathic ceramic veneer for a maxillary central incisor were fabricated. Individual specimens were processed according to different intaglio surface-etching protocols: no etching, etching for 90 seconds, etching for 120 seconds, and etching for 150 seconds (9.6% hydrofluoric acid used for all etching groups). It was observed that the 120-second etching protocol resulted in a favorable microroughness surface pattern in the platinum foil group. This pattern was comparable to that obtained by etching for 90 seconds with hydrofluoric acid the intaglio surface of veneers fabricated with the refractory die technique. Increasing the etching time to 150 seconds did not result in a more favorable roughness pattern.
International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 3/2023
DOI: 10.11607/prd.2023.3.ePages 278, Language: EnglishAvila-Ortiz, Gustavo / Gonzalez-Martin, Oscar
EditorialInternational Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 5/2022
DOI: 10.11607/prd.6055Pages 577-585, Language: EnglishUrban, Istvan A / Tattan, Mustafa / Ravida, Andrea / Saleh, Muhammad Ha / Tavelli, Lorenzo / Avila-Ortiz, Gustavo
Severe alveolar ridge deficiencies in concomitance with periodontal attachment loss can represent a serious clinical challenge in the context of implant therapy. The present case report describes the management of a complex defect in the esthetic zone via ridge augmentation and periodontal regenerative therapy using a biologic material. A systemically healthy 55-year-old man diagnosed with peri-implantitis around an implant in the maxillary left central incisor position and with severe bone loss on the mesial aspect of the maxillary left lateral incisor underwent several surgical interventions to achieve simultaneous vertical ridge augmentation and periodontal regeneration. These interventions included implant removal, bone augmentation using a composite bone graft (autogenous bone + xenograft particles), and a bioactive protein (recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor), soft tissue augmentation using connective tissue grafts, and peri-implant keratinized mucosa width augmentation via a labial gingival graft strip and a xenogeneic collagen matrix. Substantial gains in vertical bone and clinical attachment were achieved, which allowed for delayed implant placement and subsequent completion of tooth replacement therapy with an implant-supported prosthesis. The present case report demonstrates how simultaneous vertical ridge augmentation and periodontal regeneration can be achieved to manage a challenging clinical situation. Key factors to consider in this type of scenario are proximal bone level, tooth mobility, surgical flap design and management, biomaterial selection, and proper treatment sequencing.