Purpose: The purpose of this laboratory study was to evaluate common materials for isolation and neutralizing agents for hydrofluoric acid (HF). Additionally, surfaces of lithium disilicate ceramic were examined for precipitates after the etching and neutralizing process.
Materials and Methods: The HF permeability of the following isolation agents (n=8) was investigated by positioning them over pH indicator paper under airtight conditions and applying 9% HF: latex rubber dam; elastic plastomer rubber dam; nitrile gloves; latex gloves; liquid rubber dam; Teflon; AZ strip. Four neutralizing agents were tested (n = 8): calcium carbonate plus chlorhexidine gel; calcium hydroxide; calcium D-gluconate monohydrate plus chlorhexidine gel; IPS neutralizing powder plus water. Each agent was mixed with HF, according to a calculated ratio, followed by determining the pH value. Forty lithium disilicate ceramic specimens were divided into five groups (n=8), according to the etching and neutralizing protocol, and examined for precipitates by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis.
Results: All isolation agents were impermeable to HF, except for Teflon. HF could be neutralized with neutralizing agents under laboratory conditions, with mean central pH values ranging from 6 to 11. Assessment with SEM showed precipitates on surfaces when neutralizing with calcium hydroxide only. EDX analysis confirmed residues of calcium fluoride among others.
Conclusion: All tested isolation agents, except for Teflon, seem suitable for clinical use. When using calcium hydroxide for neutralizing, precipitates could remain on the surface of lithium disilicate ceramic. Palabras clave: acid etching, glass-ceramic repair, hydrofluoric acid, intraoral repair, isolation agent, lithium disilicate ceramic, neutralization, neutralizing agent