Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the fracture behavior of cantilever fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) fabricated from 3Y-TZP, 4Y-TZP, or 5Y-TZP zirconia.
Method and materials: Posterior cantilever FDPs (three groups, each n = 16) were digitally designed and milled. After sintering, eight specimens/group were stored in demineralized water for 72 hours; eight specimens/group were subjected to accelerated aging using chewing simulation with thermal cycling (1,200,000 × 50 N; 2 × 3,000 × 5°C/55°C; H2O, 2 minutes/cycle) and finally stored in demineralized water for 24 hours. The cantilever FDPs were then statically loaded to failure to determine fracture load. Phase transformation towards the monoclinic phase was controlled with x-ray diffractometry.
Results: One failure was identified after accelerated aging in the 5Y-TZP group. Fracture load decreased with increasing yttria content and decreasing bending strength. Accelerated aging using chewing simulation with thermal cycling caused a significant decline in fracture load. All FDPs failed in the area of the prepared tooth and in proximity to the cantilever, where the largest bending moment occurred. The yttria content had no influence on the type of fracture. With increasing yttria content, the relation between deformation and fracture load decreased only slightly. On the surface of FDPs that had been subjected to chewing simulation, no phase transformation towards the monoclinic phase (eg, low temperature degradation) was detected.
Conclusion: Within the limitations of a laboratory study, the data indicate that 3Y-, 4Y-, and 5Y-TZP may be employed as material for the fabrication of permanent posterior cantilever FDPs. However, more data are necessary to finally advocate the application of 5-Y-TZP. (Quintessence Int 2022;53:414–422; doi: 10.3290/j.qi.b2793243)
Palabras clave: cantilever fixed dental prosthesis, fracture load, 3Y-TZP, 4Y-TZP, 5Y-TZP, zirconia
