Purpose: To assess two types of abutment materials routinely used in daily practice—direct polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and a zirconia-on—Ti-base abutment—and their effects on peri-implant soft tissues and bone remodeling in a minipig model. Materials and Methods: A total of 40 implants were placed in five minipigs in a single-stage surgery. Four different types of abutment materials (n = 10 per group) were used: (1) titanium (control); (2) zirconia (control); (3) PMMA (test 1); and (4) Ti-base (zirconia bonded to a titanium framework; test 2). After 3 months of healing, the samples were collected and subjected to nondecalcified histology. The soft tissue dimensions (sulcus, junctional epithelium, and connective tissue attachment) were assessed on each abutment mesially and distally, and the distance from the implant margin to the first bone-to-implant contact (BIC) was measured. Results: No statistically significant differences were found among the four groups regarding soft tissue dimensions (P = .21), and a long junctional epithelium (mean: 4.1 mm) and a short connective tissue attachment (mean: 0.3 mm) were found in the majority of abutments. In some samples, the junctional epithelium extended all the way to the bone level. The measured peri-implant bone remodeling was similar in all four groups (P = .25). Conclusions: The present findings indicate that both direct PMMA and zirconia-on–Ti-base abutments seem to allow soft tissue integration similar to that of titanium and zirconia abutments. However, clinical studies are warranted to either confirm or refute the observed findings and to further investigate the influence of different materials on mucointegration.