DOI: 10.11607/ijp.5446, PubMed ID (PMID): 29145528Pagine 63-66, Lingua: IngleseUnkovskiy, Alexey / Brom, Joern / Huettig, Fabian / Keutel, ConstanzeThe utilization of additive manufacturing (AM) technology for the production of auricular prostheses has been widely acknowledged. However, few studies and case history reports have evaluated the esthetic outcomes of AM prostheses compared to those of conventionally manufactured prostheses. In this case history report, three manufacturing approaches- conventional, indirect, and direct mold preparation-were assessed for their esthetic outcomes in the same patient.
