PubMed-ID: 21197492Seiten: 1153-1158, Sprache: EnglischDel'Acqua, Marcelo Antonialli / Chávez, Alejandro Muñoz / Castanharo, Sabrina Maria / Compagnoni, Marco Antonio / De Assis Mollo jr., FranciscoPurpose: This in vitro study compared the dimensional accuracy of two impression techniques: Duralay splinted impression copings (D) and metal splinted impression copings (M) for implant-supported prostheses.
Materials and Methods: A master cast with four parallel implant abutment analogs and a passive framework were fabricated. Vinyl polysiloxane impression material was used for all impressions with a metal stock tray. Two groups (D and M) were tested (n = 5). The measurement method employed was just one titanium screw tightened to the framework. Each group's measurements were analyzed using software that received the images of a video camera coupled to a stereomicroscope at x100 magnification. The results were analyzed statistically (t test).
Results: The mean values of abutment/framework interface gaps were: master cast = 32 µm (SD 2), group D =165 µm (SD 60), and group M = 69 µm (SD 36). There was a statistically significant difference between the D and M groups (P = .001).
Conclusion: Under the limitations of this study, it could be suggested that a more accurate working cast can be fabricated using metal splinted impression copings.
Schlagwörter: dental implant, implant impression technique, splinting material