DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a43610, PubMed ID (PMID): 31802066Pages 509-516, Language: EnglishKhan, Aftab A. / Mohamed, Badreldin A. / Al-Shamrani, Sultan Saleh / Ramakrishnaiah, Ravikumar / Perea-Lowery, Leila / Säilynoja, Eija / Vallittu, Pekka K.Purpose: This study examined the influence of different monomer systems on the tensile bond strength between a resin composite and a polymerized fiber-reinforced composite (FRC). The influence of the age (shelf-life) of the FRC prepreg (reinforcing fiber pre-impregnated with a resin system) before preparing the FRC substrate for the bonding test was also assessed.
Materials and Methods: Semi-interpenetrating polymer network (semi-IPN)-based glass FRC prepregs were aged for various durations (1, 1.5, and 3 years) at 4°C before being used to prepare FRC substrates via light polymerization. Four groups of aged prepregs were prepared through different treatments with: 1. no primer; 2. a dimethacrylate-based adhesive primer; 3. a universal primer; and 4. a specific composite primer. Subsequently, a resin composite luting cement was applied on the treated FRC substrates and cured with light. The water sorption of the FRC-composite specimens was determined. Then, the differences in the tensile bond strength were evaluated using ANOVA (p ≤ 0.05).
Results: There were significant differences in the tensile bond strength between the composite cement and the FRC according to the primer used (p 0.001), aging time (p 0.001), and their interactive effect (p 0.001).
Conclusion: The monomers of the universal primer demonstrated the best ability to diffuse into the semi-IPN structure of the polymer matrix of FRC. This improved the interfacial bond strength between the composite cement and the FRC substrate.
Keywords: adhesive interface, fiber-reinforced composite, poly(methyl methacrylate), primer, semi-interpenetrating polymer network, tensile bond strength
