Purpose: To evaluate the performance of fully (Celtra Duo, Dentsply Sirona) and partially (VITA Suprinity, VITA) crystallized zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate and partially sintered lithium disilicate (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent) glass-ceramics submitted to polishing, glazing, or no surface treatment after aging.
Materials and methods: Specimens of each glass-ceramic were subjected to polishing with rubber cups (POL), glazing (GL), or control (C; no treatment) and afterwards aged with 18,000 thermal cycles (5°C to 55°C). The average roughness (Ra), 2D and 3D morphology, contact angle, multispecies biofilm formation (Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans), and mechanical strength were evaluated by atomic force microscopy (AFM, n = 5), sessile-drop goniometry (n = 5), spectrophotometry (n = 5), and flexural strength test (n = 10), respectively. Data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance and Tukey test (α = 5%).
Results: POL promoted lower Ra than glazing, and Celtra Duo presented higher Ra than IPS e.max CAD (P < .05). Surfaces without polishing promoted higher Ra than the POL group (P < .001), greater contact angle (P < .001), and significant morphologic changes, regardless of the glass-ceramic. Irrespective of the treatment, the contact angle was higher in Celtra Duo, and regardless of the material, there was higher biofilm formation and lower flexural strength of unpolished compared to POL or GL ceramics.
Conclusion: Polishing with rubber cups promoted lower roughness and minor morphologic surface alterations, but biofilm formation and flexural strength were similar to the glazed surface. In general, Celtra Duo and VITA Suprinity showed similar behavior to IPS e.max CAD, which makes zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramics a good option for indirect restorations.
