Purpose: To critically evaluate the recently published INfORM/IADR consensus paper containing ten key points for good clinical practice in the management of patients with temporomandibular disorders. Materials and Methods: After perusing the text of the document, followed by intensive discussion, the 10 key points were carefully analyzed and commented. Results: Two key points could be replaced by other (clinically relevant) statements. In addition to terminologically and semantically imprecise formulations some verbal descriptions remain superficial and vague. While no distinction was made between acute and chronic TMDs, the INfORM/IADR author group differentiates between first-line and second-line therapeutic modalities without explaining the rationale for such a classification. Furthermore, no medication recommendations were made. Conclusions: We anticipate that the INfORM/IADR publication will have a beneficial impact on the care of TMD patients. However, in our opinion, a reflection on some of the contents of the 10-point document seems justified in order to reduce the risk of misinterpretation of some statements, which could lead to inappropriate diagnostic and therapeutic measures.
