Wir verwenden Cookies ausschließlich zu dem Zweck, technisch notwendige Funktionen wie das Login oder einen Warenkorb zu ermöglichen, oder Ihre Bestätigung zu speichern. Mehr Informationen zur Datenerhebung und -verarbeitung finden Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung.
Dr. Jose Nart erhielt seinen zahnmedizinischen Abschluss im Jahr 2001 von der Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (UIC) in Barcelona, Spanien, und sein Fortgeschrittenenzertifikat in Parodontologie und Implantatchirurgie von der Tufts University im Jahr 2007. Dr. Nart wurde im Mai 2008 mit dem Diplomate-Status vom American Board of Periodontology ausgezeichnet, und er erlangte seinen Doktortitel in Zahnmedizin im Jahr 2010 mit dem höchsten Grad. Derzeit ist er Professor, Vorsitzender und Programmdirektor der Abteilung für Parodontologie an der UIC-Barcelona und Präsident der Spanischen Gesellschaft für Parodontologie und Osseointegration (SEPA). Er leitet zusammen mit seiner Familie eine bekannte multidisziplinäre Privatpraxis in Barcelona, die Nart Dental Clinic, als medizinischer Direktor. Dr. Nart ist Autor vieler internationaler Publikationen mit hohem JCR-Impact (+110), weltweiter Redner und Gutachter für die renommiertesten Zeitschriften in den Bereichen Parodontologie und Implantatzahnmedizin.
Veranstaltungen
31st EAO Annual Scientific Meeting
Details make perfection24. Okt. 2024 — 26. Okt. 2024MiCo - Milano Convention Centre, Milano, Italien
Referenten: Bilal Al-Nawas, Gil Alcoforado, Federico Hernández Alfaro, Sofia Aroca, Wael Att, Gustavo Avila-Ortiz, Kathrin Becker, Anne Benhamou, Juan Blanco Carrión, Dieter Bosshardt, Daniel Buser, Francesco Cairo, Paolo Casentini, Raffaele Cavalcanti, Tali Chackartchi, Renato Cocconi, Luca Cordaro, Luca De Stavola, Nuno Sousa Dias, Egon Euwe, Vincent Fehmer, Alberto Fonzar, Helena Francisco, Lukas Fürhauser, German O. Gallucci, Oscar Gonzalez-Martin, Dominik Groß, Robert Haas, Alexis Ioannidis, Simon Storgård Jensen, Ronald Jung, France Lambert, Luca Landi, Georg Mailath-Pokorny jun., Silvia Masiero, Iva Milinkovic, Carlo Monaco, Jose Nart, José M. Navarro, Katja Nelson, Manuel Nienkemper, David Nisand, Michael Payer, Sergio Piano, Bjarni E. Pjetursson, Sven Reich, Isabella Rocchietta, Giuseppe Romeo, Irena Sailer, Mariano Sanz, Ignacio Sanz Martín, Frank Schwarz, Shakeel Shahdad, Massimo Simion, Ralf Smeets, Benedikt Spies, Bogna Stawarczyk, Martina Stefanini, Hendrik Terheyden, Tiziano Testori, Daniel Thoma, Ana Torres Moneu, Piero Venezia, Lukas Waltenberger, Hom-Lay Wang, Stefan Wolfart, Giovanni Zucchelli, Otto Zuhr
European Association for Osseintegration (EAO)
EuroPerio10
15. Juni 2022 — 18. Juni 2022Bella Center Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Dänemark
Referenten: Mario Aimetti, Zvi Artzi, Serhat Aslan, Georgios Belibasakis, Florian Beuer, Juan Blanco Carrión, Michael M. Bornstein, Nagihan Bostanci, Philippe Bouchard, Darko Božić, Olivier Carcuac, Maria Clotilde Carra, Nelson Carranza, Iain L. C. Chapple, Pierpaolo Cortellini, Jan Cosyn, Mike Curtis, Francesco D'Aiuto, Bettina Dannewitz, Luca De Stavola, Jan Derks, Nikolaos Donos, Peter Eickholz, Bahar Eren Kuru, Ricardo Faria Almeida, Roberto Farina, Magda Feres, Elena Figuero, Dagmar Fosså Bunæs, Rok Gašperšič, William Giannobile, Cecilie Gjerde Gjengedal, Moshe Goldstein, Marjolaine Gosset, Klaus Gotfredsen, Filippo Graziani, Adrian Guerrero, George Hajishengallis, Hady Haririan, Lisa J. A. Heitz-Mayfield, Palle Holmstrup, Marc Hürzeler, Mark Ide, Søren Jepsen, Ronald Jung, Sérgio Kahn, Anhgela R. Kamer, Alpdogan Kantarci, Moritz Kebschull, Björn Klinge, Thomas Kocher, Odd Carsten Koldsland, Kenneth Kornman, Marja Laine, Markus Laky, Isabelle Laleman, Evanthia Lalla, France Lambert, Luca Landi, Niklaus P. Lang, Antonio Liñares, Tomas Linkevičius, Bruno Loos, Rodrigo Lopez, Eli Machtei, Aslan Mammadov, Mauro Merli, Andrea Mombelli, Eduardo Montero, Niki Moutsopoulos, Jose Nart, Gustavo G. Nascimento, Ian Needleman, Tiernan O'Brien, William Papaioannou, Panos N. Papapanou, Michael A. Pikos, Pawel Plakwicz, Constanza Pontarolo, Philip M. Preshaw, Marc Quirynen, Mia Rakic, Christoph Andreas Ramseier, Hélène Rangé, Papageorgiou Spyridon, Maurizio S. Tonetti, Leonardo Trombelli, Istvan Urban, Fridus van der Weijden, Fabio Vignoletti, Charalambos Vlachopoulos, Nicola West, Asaf Wilensky, Ion Zabalegui, Egija Zaura, Nicola Zitzmann, Giovanni Zucchelli, Otto Zuhr, Fardal Øystein
European Federation of Periodontology (EFP)
Zeitschriftenbeiträge dieses Autors
The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 6/2023
DOI: 10.11607/jomi.10415, PubMed-ID: 38085745Seiten: 1145-1150, Sprache: EnglischMonje, Alberto / Pons, Ramón / Amerio, Ettore / Lin, Guo-Hao / Ortiz-González, Luis / Kan, Joseph Y. / Nart, José
Purpose: To assess site-related features of peri-implantitis occurring adjacent to teeth and its association with the proximal periodontal bone level. Materials and Methods: Periapical radiographs were collected from partially edentulous patients exhibiting peri-implantitis adjacent to teeth. The following variables were quantified: intrabony defect width (DW), implant marginal bone loss (MBLi), tooth marginal bone loss (MBLt), implant-tooth distance (ITd), intrabony defect angulation (DA), adjacent periodontal bone peak height (ABPh), and implant-tooth angulation (ITa). A correlation matrix using the Spearman correlation coefficient was created to explore the dependence of these variables. Univariate linear regression analysis was carried out by means of generalized estimating equations (GEE), using MBLt as dependent variable. Results: Overall, 61 patients and 84 implants were included in this study, consisting of a total of 105 implant sites facing adjacent teeth. This resulted in 515 linear and 194 angular measurements. A total of 11 different statistically significant associations were demonstrated between the different variables analyzed. Moreover, the univariate regression analysis revealed significant positive associations between MBLt and MBLi (P = .013) and between MBLt and periodontitis (PD) (P = .014). These associations were confirmed in the multivariate model. Conclusions: Teeth adjacent to untreated peri-implantitis lesions are associated with proximal loss of periodontal support. This finding is more remarkable in scenarios that display short implant-tooth distance.
Schlagwörter: peri-implantitis, peri-implant diseases, dental implant, periodontal disease, periodontitis
Tissue volume loss after tooth extraction is an esthetic challenge. The socket-shield technique (SST) has been used to compensate it with promising results but limited evidence. This prospective study aims to present the dimensional changes after SST. Ten consecutive patients with an anterior hopeless tooth to be extracted and an immediate implant placed using the SST were prospectively enrolled. An impression and a CBCT scan were taken prior to surgery and 6 months later. Models were scanned, and DICOM and STL (standard tessellation language) files were superimposed and analyzed by software to measure the dimensional differences. Five patients could be evaluated for bone alterations and 9 for soft tissue alterations. The mean horizontal shrinkage of the buccal bone plate at 1 mm from the most coronal part was -0.22 ± 0.13 mm in the CBCT analysis. The mean volume loss in the region of interest was -2.94 ± 2.45 mm3, with a mean change in soft tissue contours of -0.49 ± 0.41 mm between pre- and postoperative analysis. SST limited the buccal contour loss after tooth extraction and may be considered a potential option to prevent volume loss in immediate implant placement. Further standardization in the digital measurement method is still needed.
Purpose: The scarce standard therapeutic protocols for the management of peri-implant diseases results in the empirical application of therapeutic modalities. The objective of this study was to carry out a survey to analyze the therapeutic trends of professionals with different academic backgrounds and levels of expertise.
Materials and methods: An exploratory cross-sectional internet-based study survey of board-certified members of the American Academy of Periodontology (AAP) and the European Federation of Periodontology (EFP) was conducted. To assess the therapeutic trends, four clinical vignettes representing different scenarios of peri-implant biologic complications were provided to the participants. Differences in practice patterns were determined using chi-square test and Student t test or analysis of variance (ANOVA) test for qualitative variables.
Results: A total of 268 members of the AAP and EFP completed the survey. A significant difference in preferred treatment plan was found between EFP and AAP periodontists, resective therapy being the treatment of choice by the majority of the former (41.2%) and regenerative therapy by the latter (48.9%; P < .001). Overall, 48.1% of experts did not consider any intervention for the management of mucositis. Antibiotic prescriptions differed among groups, with statistical significance in each clinical case, and the explantation criteria were inconsistent and differed significantly among groups.
Conclusion: Substantial variations exist concerning the decision-making to manage peri-implant diseases and conditions.
Schlagwörter: diagnostic procedure, peri-implantitis, periodontist, periodontology, surgical procedure
Peri-implant diseases at implant sites represent the most considerable concern for many dental clinicians nowadays due to their detrimental effect on implant longevity. Preventive measures include patient education and motivation, supportive peri-implant therapy and routine assessment of the hard and soft tissues. Nevertheless, the reliability of clinical parameters to monitor peri-implant conditions is subject to debate. As such, the primary purpose of the present review was to gain further insight into the diagnostic accuracy of probing as a clinical tool to monitor dental implants and assist clinicians in preventing peri-implant diseases. Studies have recommended periodic probing to monitor the condition of the peri-implant tissues. Increased probing pocket depth, profuse bleeding on probing and suppuration at implants are clinical signs that have been associated with peri-implantitis; thus, if these clinical parameters are present, radiographic assessment is encouraged to make a definitive diagnosis considering potential inaccuracies related to local and/or systemic factors identified in the present review.
Schlagwörter: complications, diagnostic procedure, peri-implantitis, surgical
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare there are no conflicts of interest relating to this study.
Lip repositioning surgery is a predictable surgical technique that provides a solution for patients with excessive gingival smile. This case series presents four patients with 6 to 8 mm of excessive gingival display who received a modified surgical technique using internal horizontal mattress sutures to immobilize the labial superior elevator muscle. None of the patients exhibited complications, and their healing was uneventful. All patients demonstrated predictable results and presented with stability over an average of 3.5 years of follow-up. The modified lip repositioning surgery with internal horizontal mattress sutures seems to provide reliable long-term results in patients with an excessive gingival display.
The significance of keratinized mucosa around dental implants for the prevention of biologic complications has been a subject of controversy. Agreement, however, exists on the benefits provided to achieve more satisfactory oral hygiene measures and reduced clinical inflammation. A prospective interventional case series of 14 patients (31 implants) were examined every 3 months for up to 12 months. The effect of soft tissue conditioning by means of free autologous epithelial graft on the management of peri-implantitis with supracrestal and/or dehiscence-type defect morphology was evaluated. All clinical parameters were significantly reduced (P < .001), with complete disease resolution in 78.6% of the patients and 87.1% of the peri-implantitis implants. Unsuccessful cases were associated with less gain of keratinized mucosa, deep probing pocket depths, bleeding on probing, and less satisfaction during brushing at 12 months. Dimensional changes following soft tissue grafting were more significant during the first 3 months and led to a 42.4% shrinkage at 12 months. Soft tissue conditioning by means of free autologous epithelial graft in combination with apically positioned flap is a viable and effective therapy to manage peri-implantitis associated with deficient keratinized mucosa.
Subgingival margins are often associated with adverse periodontal reactions, such as recession and gingival inflammation. The purpose of this cross-sectional dual-center study was to evaluate the periodontal health and stability of intrasulcular margins, comparing two prosthetic margin preparations: subgingival chamfer (SC) and subgingival feather-edge (SF) with gingival curettage. Ninetysix patients with 205 crowns (buccal margin 0.5 mm into the gingival sulcus) were included in the study. SF, gingival curettage, and intrasulcular restorative margin were prepared on 109 crowns; SC was prepared on 96. Restorations were in place for a mean of 55.9 months (range: 12 months to 10 years). No significant differences were found regarding probing depth between the two groups (mean buccal: 1.6 mm; mean interproximal: 2.3 mm). Significant increased recession was present around SCs, showing a higher margin-exposure frequency (buccal: 19.8% vs 3.7%; interproximal: 5.2% vs 1.4%). SC showed 8.5 times the risk of margin exposure compared to SF, men 5.5 times compared to women, and smokers 3.7 times compared to nonsmokers. Follow-up time was not a significant factor. SC sites showed a tendency for reduced buccal bleeding on probing compared to SF sites (3.0% vs 12.1%), but no significant difference was seen in a regression model. Plaque presence increased the risk of bleeding (4.1×), and women presented a higher risk of bleeding than men (3×). Subgingival margins can provide adequate periodontal health and stability if restorative procedures are well controlled and if patients are enrolled in an adequate maintenance program. SF with intrasulcular margin favors facial soft tissue stability, as reduced gingival recession was observed. The technique should be carefully applied to promote an adequate periodontal response.
This study sought to evaluate gingival volume changes following root coverage with the vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access (VISTA) procedure. Pre- and postoperative surface scans of 21 patients (154 teeth) treated with VISTA using various graft materials were digitally superimposed to quantify volumetric changes. A linear gingival thickness gain of approximately 1 mm and volumetric gain of 5.47 mm3 were achieved. A negative correlation was found between linear thickness gain and root prominence. The thickness achieved was not different with various graft materials. Since gingival thickness has been identified as an important predictor of periodontal root coverage, the methodology described in the present study, along with the identification of predictors of outcome, has important therapeutic implications.
Purpose: To determine whether chemical and thermal stress as well as sharpening are aspects that must be considered to determine when a curette has become too weak to be used safely without the threat of breakage.
Materials and Methods: A total sample of 35 curette blades was divided into 2 principal groups, control (groups 1 to 3) and experimental (groups 4 to 6). The control group was divided into 3 colour-coded groups of 19 similar curette blades and was only subjected to progressive sharpening wear (not sterilised). The test group included 16 Gracey curette blades that were subjected to various degrees of progressive wear and different numbers of sterilisation cycles in 3 subgroups (subgroup 4 had 5 sterilisation cycles; subgroup 5 had 30 cycles and experimental subgroup 6 had 55 cycles). Using a universal testing machine, all blades were tested for strength until they fractured.
Results: No evidence was found that the simple presence or absence of sterilisation cycles produced a statistically significant difference between the two studied groups (sterilised and not sterilised). However, when comparing the six subgroups that underwent different numbers of sterilisation cycles, the analysis showed that the more sterilisation cycles a curette underwent, the more likely the curette was to fracture (p = 0.047).
Conclusion: Sterilisation by itself does not produce a significant change in the fracture strength, whereas the number of sterilisation cycles clearly weakens the instrument. Sterilisation is a factor to control when evaluating the life of a periodontal curette for the patients' and professionals' safety.
Schlagwörter: fracture strength, non-surgical periodontal therapy, periodontal curettes, scaling and root planing, sharpening
Periodontal biotype is a key element influencing esthetic treatment outcomes in clinical practice. However, while the soft and hard tissue thicknesses of maxillary anterior teeth have been widely studied, information regarding mandibular anterior teeth is scarce. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine whether there is a relationship in terms of hard and soft tissue thickness between maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth. The present study included 90 maxillary and 90 mandibular anterior teeth in 15 healthy patients. Clinical and cone beam computed tomography measurements were taken to determine gingival and buccal bone thickness, respectively, and a correlation was made between maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth. No statistically significant differences were found when comparing gingival and buccal bone thickness at the crestal third and midpoint of maxillary and mandibular teeth (P > .05). However, some differences were observed at the apical third between the two groups. The results suggest that soft and hard tissue dimensions of maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth are comparable, especially in the coronal third. However, more studies are necessary to confirm that maxillary anterior teeth can be used as a reference when dealing with mandibular incisors and canines.